Access Denied--The Iroquois Nationals

The saga is over for the Iroquois Nationals Lacrosse Team this 2010 tourney, while maintaining sovereignty and their identity as individuals from sovereign nations as Indigenous people living within a colonized state (read as country) on their own territory or within the greater U.S., they bowed out of the games with dignity, grace and power.

After having received verification that the team would be granted reentry back into the U.S. by Secretary of State, Hilary Rodham Clinton, the English government denied them entry into the UK in the end, going back on their word. It started with the English government's seeming concern that Our team wouldn't be allowed to gain reentry back into the U.S. while traveling on their own passports, the Haudenosaunee passport, which was apparently being denied by the U.S. government due to "security measures" and possibly a new stance against tribal sovereignty--as well as the team not being in possession of a reentry visa that is a U.S. document--which conflicts with the entire concept of sovereignty as well as their own passport. This has never stopped individuals from traversing borders utilizing the Haudenosaunee passport before, although that is not to say no one has had difficulty in the past.

What was clearly evident during this entire debacle was a lack of support from other federation member teams and an absence of any official stance from the FIL (Federation of International Lacrosse, the games global governing body). Maybe it was befitting that the U.S. lost to Canada and England lost to Australia on day 3, both countries responsible for the delay and ultimate forfeiture of the Iroquois Nationals.

Although this is only a sport, what was and is at stake goes much deeper than a lacrosse stick, cleats, pads and a helmet. Sovereignty and identity are at the root of this international incident that the U.S. and British deemed an issue of importance and a battle to be fought in keeping the Iroquois Nationals from participating in these global games. An issue that the U.S. claims is one of security, on a national level that is definitely debatable given past events that have allowed two individuals to have gotten close enough to the President of the U.S. at a State dinner to have posed more of a threat than the reentry of a sporting team back into the borders of the U.S. on their own passport (contemporary security measures in place on said passport or not).

This is the Iroquois Nationals Lacrosse team, which was recognized by the FIL and invited to participate as a team back in 1990, if I remember my lacrosse history. This is why I think the silence of FIL may have jeopardized Our team from attending in the long run. They could have threatened to revoke England's membership or the U.S.'s for that matter simply as a sign of solidarity with the struggle the Iroquois had to endure to eventually not attend. Not only that, but team members of the U.S. could have spoken out themselves, many have been teammates of individual Iroquois members at the collegiate level and within the U.S. professional arena of lacrosse (MLL and NLL). It seems we have entered an era where there is no apparent political or moral conscience by the individual athlete.


A great article out of Alaska:

http://www.adn.com/2010/07/15/1368823_iroquois-nationals-stopped-by.html